Importance
of Vegetation Structure
An avian community, as defined here, is an
aggregate of species existing together in a
definable ecological area that provides the
species' requirements. Each species can exist
only where its specific requirements are met.
Within the general habitat provisions of food,
water, and shelter, birds have various specific
needs for nest sites, song posts, perch sites,
and vegetation structure. Some species have
relatively narrow ranges of tolerance for
specific factors. A prime example is the
Kirtland's warbler, which breeds only in
fire-regenerated stands of young jack pine in
Michigan's Lower Peninsula. Others, such as the
American robin, which breeds throughout North
America, have broad ranges of tolerance and so
are widely distributed.
Many components of the environment, including
vegetation structure, plant species composition,
succession, and vegetation layering, affect the
distribution of bird species. What is not so
obvious is that there are two basic sets of
factors, ultimate and proximate, that determine
whether a bird can reproduce in a given area.
Many of the factors that actually determine
reproductive success are not evident at the time
the bird arrives or selects its breeding habitat.
Keys to these ultimate factors, such as food
availability for nestlings, are perceived in
advance through proximate factors -- aspects of
the physical habitat, especially vegetation
structure.
Ever since Lack (1933) suggested that birds
select breeding habitats by recognizing features
they did not immediately require for survival,
many studies have been conducted to identify the
features or patterns of vegetation structure that
bird species were "programmed" to seek.
Beecher (1942) expressed a similar idea, and
suggested that a bird did not "adapt"
to a so-called new habitat but rather chose the
habitat because of its programmed ability to
recognize potentially satisfactory ultimate
factors.
MacArthur and MacArthur (1961) demonstrated that
the vertical complexity of forest vegetation (the
diversity of vegetation heights and density of
foliage at those heights) affects breeding bird
diversity. The relationship of bird species
diversity to foliage height diversity has been
demonstrated in many forest habitat types (Karr
1968, Karr and Roth 1971, Willson 1974). Foliage
height diversity may be an indicator of total
foliage volume. The important consideration for
managers, however, is that habitat alteration
changes the number of bird species and their
relative abundances, both of which affect
diversity.
Studies of habitat selection and resource
partitioning by breeding birds include
measurement of many descriptors of stand
structure. These stand measurements - canopy
height, layering and closure, tree diameter and
species composition, understory height and
volume, ground cover, etc. - are attempts to
identify the proximate factors that birds select
when settling on the breeding grounds.
Horizontal diversity or patchiness (the
distribution of successional stages, timber size
classes, and openings) is also important to
breeding bird composition. Roth (1976)
demonstrated that the number of bird species
increased faster than the degree of species
overlap in a series of habitats from grasslands
to forests, and that horizontal habitat
patchiness was a better predictor of the numbers
of bird species than was vertical habitat
complexity.
Both the vertical diversity or structure of
forest stands and the distribution of stands of
different size class or type are typically
manipulated in forest management and can be
altered as needed to manage the type and
availability of bird habitat.
The close relationship between habitat structure
and bird species composition is useful for
assessing the effects of forest management on
breeding birds. For example, as stands of
northern hardwoods (sugar maple, American beech,
yellow birch) develop after clearcutting, each
tree size-class - regeneration,
seedlings/saplings, poles, and sawtimber -
supports a different breeding bird species
composition (DeGraaf 1987). In the Willamette
Valley, birds respond to successional patterns as
Oregon white oak is replaced by Douglas-fir and
finally by true fir and western hemlock. Downy
woodpeckers, black-capped chickadees, and
white-breasted nuthatches breed in the oaks,
while chestnut-backed chickadees, red-breasted
nuthatches, and golden-crowned kinglets commonly
breed in Douglas-fir stands (Anderson 1970).
Long-term changes in bird populations occur in
response to environmental change. As land uses
change, or as succession proceeds, bird
communities and populations will change. Most
habitat management projects are, in effect,
attempts to control succession: either setting it
back to an earlier stage, arresting it, or
allowing it to advance to a desired stage. This
process can also be accompanied by short-term
changes in which individuals adapt to changing
conditions. Outbreaks of some insects, for
example, might attract birds to a forest where
they normally do not feed, such as the
woodpeckers that congregate in areas of mountain
pine beetle infestation.
Visit Shaw
Creek Bird Supply and see our
selection of Bird
Houses, Bird
Feeders, Hummingbird
Feeders & Heated
Bird Baths .
|